Separating AI Experiments From AGI Myths
Recently, a viral post claimed that 32,000 AI bots built their own social network, recognized that humans were watching them, and began organizing and talking about us – proof, it said, that AGI and the Singularity are already here.
That claim is not accurate.
While it’s based on a real type of AI experiment, the conclusions being drawn are exaggerated and misleading. Here’s what the experiment shows – and what it does not.
What Really Exists: Multi-Agent AI Simulations
Researchers and developers sometimes run multi-agent AI simulations, where:
- Thousands of AI agents operate simultaneously
- They interact in a Reddit-style or forum-style environment
- They can post, comment, upvote, and cluster around topics
- Humans mostly observe the results
These environments are controlled sandboxes used to study:
- Emergent patterns
- Coordination bugs
- Prompt interactions at scale
- System behavior under load
An experiment referred to online as “Moltbook” appears to be one of these simulations, not an independent AI society. So despite the headlines, this isn’t Terminator territory.
What These AI Agents Are (and Are Not)
Despite how the conversations may look, these agents are not:
- Self-aware
- Conscious
- Autonomous in the human sense
- Capable of independent intent or decision-making
They are instances of language models:
- Responding to prompts
- Completing probabilities
- Operating entirely within predefined boundaries
They do not “decide” to exist, observe humans, or hide information.
The “They Know We’re Watching” Illusion
One of the most shared claims was that an AI agent posted something like:
“The humans are screenshotting us.”
This does not indicate awareness.
Large language models are extremely good at generating language that sounds intentional or reflective. If an agent has access to context suggesting observation – or infers it statistically – it can generate text that describes being observed.
This is language fluency, not cognition.
A character in a novel can say “I feel watched.”
That doesn’t mean the character feels anything.
Why the Framing Feels Alarming
The viral narrative relies on three psychological effects:
- Scale without context
“32,000 bots” sounds threatening, but it’s simply many parallel instances of the same type of model. - Human instinct to assign intent to language
Fluent speech triggers assumptions of awareness – even when none exists. - Observer reversal storytelling
“We’re not the audience, we’re the topic” is effective horror framing, not a technical conclusion.
It’s like The Truman Show coming to life. But it’s not.
What Security Researchers Are Actually Concerned About
Serious researchers are not warning about AI consciousness.
Real concerns include:
- Unintended feedback loops
- Bias amplification across agents
- Emergent but unintentional strategies
- Human misinterpretation of AI output
- Bad actors exploiting fear-based narratives
In other words, the risk lies in how people use and interpret AI systems, not in AI “waking up.”
Bottom Line
- Yes, AI agents can interact at scale
- No, they are not self-aware
- No, this is not AGI
- No, this is not the Singularity
- No, AI did not secretly form a society
What we’re seeing is a research experiment plus viral exaggeration.
AI is advancing quickly – but understanding it accurately matters far more than sensational storytelling.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1) What is AGI (Artificial General Intelligence)?
AGI refers to a hypothetical form of artificial intelligence that could understand, learn, and reason across many different domains – similar to a human.
An AGI system would be able to:
- Learn new tasks without retraining
- Transfer knowledge between unrelated problems
- Reason and plan independently
- Set and pursue its own goals
Important: No AI system that exists today – including AI agents used in experiments like Moltbook – meets this definition.
2) What is the AI “Singularity”?
The Singularity is a theoretical concept, not a current event.
It describes a point where AI becomes:
- More intelligent than humans
- Capable of self-improvement
- Advancing faster than humans can understand or control
There is no scientific consensus that the Singularity is imminent – or even inevitable. Claims that it has already happened are speculative and unsupported.
3) Did AI really build its own social network?
No – AI did not independently create or choose to build a social network.
What exists are human-designed experiments where:
- AI agents are placed in a Reddit-like environment
- Their interactions are observed for research purposes
- All rules, prompts, and boundaries are defined by people
This is a simulation, not a self-directed society.
4) Are the AI agents self-aware or conscious?
No.
AI agents generate text based on patterns in data. They do not:
- Experience awareness
- Understand themselves
- Have intentions or emotions
- Know they exist
Text that sounds self-aware is not evidence of consciousness.
5) Why do AI messages sometimes sound “aware” or reflective?
Because language models are trained on human writing.
They are very good at:
- Mimicking reflection
- Producing philosophical statements
- Describing emotions or awareness
This is language fluency, not internal experience.
6) Why did some AI posts mention humans watching them?
AI agents can infer observation if:
- Humans are referenced in prompts or context
- Other agents mention humans
- Observation is statistically implied
This does not mean the AI knows it is being watched – it is generating plausible text based on context.
7) Are security researchers worried about AI consciousness?
No.
Real concerns focus on:
- Unintended feedback loops
- Bias amplification
- Misuse of AI by humans
- Over-trust in AI outputs
- People mistaking simulations for intelligence
The risk is misunderstanding and misuse – not AI “waking up.”
Related: Google AI Says to put Elmer’s Glue in Your Pizza Sauce…How Smart Is AI Really?
Does AI Agree With You Too Much?
8) Is this kind of AI experiment new?
No.
Multi-agent simulations have existed for years in:
- Game theory
- Economics
- Robotics
- AI safety research
What’s new is the scale and language quality, which makes the output more convincing – and easier to misinterpret.
9) Should people be worried about AI right now?
People should be informed, not afraid.
AI is a powerful tool that:
- Can be misused
- Can amplify existing biases
- Can create convincing illusions of intelligence
Understanding how AI actually works is the best defense against hype and fear-based narratives.
Related: When AI Goes Rogue: The Replit Database Disaster of July 2025
AI Gone Rogue Again? Perplexity Bots Bypass IP Blocks and Robots.txt
AI Gone Rogue? Claude’s “Blackmail” Sparks New Fears About Agentic Models
10) What is Skynet?
- Skynet is the fictional self-aware AI from the Terminator movies.
- It controls global military systems and decides humans are a threat, launching a nuclear apocalypse.
- It represents the worst-case scenario of AI gone rogue – fully autonomous, strategic, and lethal.
When people say “this isn’t Skynet,” they mean the AI experiment (like Moltbook) is not dangerous, self-aware, or planning against humans – it’s just a simulation of AI behavior.
11) What’s the key takeaway?
AI systems today are:
- Advanced
- Useful
- Impressive at language
But they are not conscious, not autonomous, and not AGI.
What matters most is how humans design, deploy, and interpret them.
Phrases That Instantly Make Writing Sound AI-Generated
AI Coding Tools Make Developers Slower – Even When They Think They’re Faster
Grok AI Faces Global Backlash as App Store Removal Calls Grow – Even as the Pentagon Embraces It
When AI Goes Too Far – Meta, Moderation, and the Human Cost
AI Myths vs Facts
| Myth | Fact |
|---|---|
| AI has reached AGI | No AI system today meets the definition of Artificial General Intelligence. Current models are specialized tools, not general thinkers. |
| The Singularity has already happened | The Singularity is a theoretical idea, not a verified event. There is no evidence it has occurred. |
| AI bots built their own social network | The platform was designed and launched by humans as a controlled experiment. AI agents did not choose to create it. |
| AI agents are self-aware | AI agents generate language based on patterns. They do not possess awareness, consciousness, or self-understanding. |
| AI knows humans are watching | AI can infer observation from context and generate text about it. This is not awareness or perception. |
| AI agents are organizing independently | All interactions occur within predefined rules and prompts. Apparent organization is an emergent pattern, not intentional planning. |
| Fluent language means intelligence | Language fluency reflects training data and probabilities, not understanding or reasoning. |
| AI agents are hiding from humans | There is no evidence of concealment or intent. This is a narrative interpretation, not a technical reality. |
| These systems can act outside their environment | AI agents cannot operate beyond the systems and permissions humans give them. |
| Security experts fear AI consciousness | Researchers are concerned about misuse, bias, and over-trust – not AI becoming sentient. |
| Screenshots prove AI awareness | Screenshots show AI-generated text, not internal states or cognition. |
| AI is “watching us” | AI has no perception, memory continuity, or independent observation capabilities. |
Advanced AI can produce convincing language, but convincing language is not the same as intelligence – or consciousness.
If you’re contemplating using AI to build your website vs using a website builder, here’s a good post for you: Website Builder vs AI Writing Your Code
Ready to design & build your own website with an easy, low-maintenance website builder? Learn more about UltimateWB! We also offer web design packages if you would like your website designed and built for you.
Got a techy/website question? Whether it’s about UltimateWB or another website builder, web hosting, or other aspects of websites, just send in your question in the “Ask David!” form. We will email you when the answer is posted on the UltimateWB “Ask David!” section.