Imagine reading an article about medical symptoms. Three paragraphs in, you get that feeling of déjà vu: Didn’t I just read this?
You did. The article just rehashed the same point in slightly different words. Suddenly, two thoughts cross your mind:
Is the rest of this worth my time?
Did a doctor actually write or review this, or did someone generate it with AI and publish it without checking what it says?
Yikes. Double yikes for md writing. You don’t have to imagine it. It’s already out there.
Repetitive writing has become a major red flag for AI-generated content. When an article keeps circling back to the same points, readers don’t just get bored. They start questioning whether they should even keep reading because who knows if what they are reading is actually true.
Length Doesn’t Equal Value
A 2,000-word article can be excellent when it’s packed with useful details, real-world examples, and solid evidence. But padding an article to make it look more substantial? That’s a different story.
AI-generated drafts can make repetition sound surprisingly fluent. The headings look organized, the grammar is polished, and the same idea appears three different ways. Rushed human writers can do the same thing. Although to this extreme? Seems unlikely.
When the subject involves health, finance, or law, the stakes are higher. If an article hasn’t been edited well enough to catch obvious duplication, why should readers assume its claims have been checked carefully?
Search Engines Want Answers, Not Filler
Some website owners assume longer articles automatically rank higher in search results. Here’s how that thinking can backfire:
- You write 800 useful words.
- You decide you need 2,000 words to compete.
- You stretch the article with explanations and paragraphs that add little or nothing.
Congratulations. You’ve made the article longer without making it better.
Google’s guidance emphasizes helpful, people-first content, not hitting an arbitrary word count. Some topics need extensive coverage. Others don’t. Write enough to answer the question properly, and don’t pad the article just to reach a number.
Readers came to your website for information. They shouldn’t have to wade through repeated explanations to find it.
Before You Hit Publish, Edit
Do people like to read AI writing? AI red flags are a thing because they don’t.
We covered some of the warning signs and what to look out for in your writing:
- How can I avoid “AI SEO sludge”? aka AI Slop
- Phrases That Instantly Make Writing Sound AI-Generated
- Spotting the Robot in the Blog: How to Tell if AI Wrote It (and Why Google Cares If You Didn’t Fix It)
- Is the Em Dash (aka Long Dash) a Red Flag for AI Writing Now?
And if you do decide to use AI in your writing, before publishing, ask yourself:
- Does each paragraph add something new? Read neighboring paragraphs together. If one simply rephrases the other, revise it.
- Does every section earn its place? Cut or combine sections that repeat earlier points without adding useful detail or evidence.
- Is repetition serving a purpose? Reinforcing an important point can help. Repeating it without adding clarity or emphasis just takes up space.
The goal isn’t to make every article short. It’s to make it worth reading.
Looking for a website builder that lets you create and update content easily? Learn more about UltimateWB! We also offer web design packages if you would like your website designed and built for you.
Got a techy/website question? Whether it’s about UltimateWB or another website builder, web hosting, or other aspects of websites, just send in your question in the “Ask David!” form. We will email you when the answer is posted on the UltimateWB “Ask David!” section.